Religious Tests Have No Place in Our Democracy [UPDATED]
The Constitution stands for no principle more strongly than this: one’s religious beliefs and religious association have no bearing on qualifications for public service.
The Constitution stands for no principle more strongly than this: one’s religious beliefs and religious association have no bearing on qualifications for public service.
Under questioning from reporters on Capitol Hill, U.S. Senate candidate Roy Moore (R-AL) acknowledged the constitutional ban on religious test for office, but refused to explain his statement that Congress should have refused to seat a Muslim representative because of his faith.
Supporting the right of all Americans to practice their faith is not inconsistent with Christianity, contrary to the recently published views of one Air Force chaplain.
Senators should inquire into a judicial nominee’s views of the law without improperly investigating their personal religious views, or suggesting that adhering to religious dogma is disqualifying.
The BJC’s Amanda Tyler explains why Bernie Sanders’ questioning of a Trump nominee crossed an important constitutional boundary of religious liberty protection.