The question of whether the First Amendment allows for publicly funded religious charter schools may make its way to the Supreme Court before long.
The EEOC report suggests in a footnote that a “significant increase in vaccine-related charges filed on the basis of religion” is responsible for the spike in religion cases generally.
In rejecting the request for a preliminary injunction, the court emphasized that the policy impacts the teacher’s speech only in her official capacity as public school employee, not her private expression.
In a 6-3 ruling, the Supreme Court emphasized that unlike the goods and services offered by many other businesses, the custom websites proposed at issue in this case are “expressive speech” protected by the Constitution.
In the Groff v. DeJoy decision, the Court explained that co-workers’ feelings about religion, or their personal objection to religious practices, are not sufficient to deny an employee’s religious accommodation request.