Roundup of News Covering Bladensburg Cross Argument
In case you missed it, here is a survey of helpful news coverage following the Supreme Court’s Bladensburg cross oral argument.
In case you missed it, here is a survey of helpful news coverage following the Supreme Court’s Bladensburg cross oral argument.
In oral arguments today, the U.S. Supreme Court considered whether a large Latin cross on public land constitutes an impermissible preference for Christianity, or whether the cross…means something else.
A joint op-ed published by Religion News Service explains that opposing governmental expressions of religion like the Bladensburg cross is not an anti-religious stance. Just the opposite.
The U.S. Supreme Court this week will consider arguments about the religious significance of the cross and whether a large memorial on publicly owned land in Maryland violates the Constitution.
The BJC’s Amanda Tyler explains why the Supreme Court’s first church-state opinion of the term was an “astonishing display of religious preferentialism.”