Watch as several members of Congress raise the difficult issue of how to handle employee requests for religious exemptions to vaccine mandates.

As these cases suggest, the controversy over religious objections to COVID-19 vaccine mandates appears sure to continue expanding.

The Supreme Court will hear a case brought by a civic organization challenging Boston’s denial of their request to fly a Christian flag temporarily outside city hall.

Ramirez v. Collier was brought under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA), which bars state and local governments from posing a substantial burden on the religious free exercise of inmates unless that burden is necessary to further a compelling government interest.

Two Muslim women are challenging the policy of the New York Police Department that requires arrestees to remove religious headwear for their booking photo.

For those of us who pay special attention to the guarantees of religious freedom in our laws, Constitution Day is an important reminder that the extent of those protections we cherish today was not inevitable at our nation’s founding.

As we mark the 20th anniversary of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, among the legacies being remembered is the disturbing rise in anti-Muslim hostility here in the United States that followed that tragic day.

The Supreme Court granted a late-night reprieve to a Texas death row inmate and added a new case to its schedule — the first consideration of a request related to the activities of the minister in the execution chamber.

Each vaccine mandate dispute is unique, from the beliefs of the plaintiff and the specific language in the mandate or exemption policy in question to the actions of officials and the state laws that govern them.